Esrally how to send multiple search queries in a track.

For that could use below code, it has 2 search queries as operations and it’s own iterations as well.

please also make sure you’ve read this part of the documentation: Track Reference — Rally 2.2.1 documentation

Save the file as track.json and use the below command in Centos to run it.

nohup /usr/local/bin/esrally — track-path=/home/usernamefolder/samfiles — target-hosts=https://demo-site.tools — pipeline=benchmark-only — client-options=”use_ssl:true,verify_certs:false,basic_auth_user:’username’,basic_auth_password:’password’,timeout:120" >> rally_stdout.log 2>> rally_stderr.log < /dev/null &

{
  "version": 2,
  "description": "Tutorial benchmark for Rally Search",
  "indices": [
    {
      "name": "customrecords",
      "types": [
        "docs"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "schedule": [
    {
      "operation": {
        "operation-type": "cluster-health",
        "request-params": {
          "wait_for_status": "green"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "operation": {
        "name": "term-search",
        "operation-type": "search",
        "body": {
          "query": {
            "term": {
              "key_architecture": "RODSozpcCCyoYXIUPIsAVfnoubWyYNcMFpWtbQkXxUxEeiNGKa"
            }
          }
        }
      },
      "clients": 4,
      "warmup-iterations": 1000,
      "iterations": 4500,
      "target-throughput": 100
    },
    {
      "operation": {
        "name": "match-all-query",
        "operation-type": "search",
        "body": {
          "query": {
            "match_all": {}
          }
        }
      },
      "clients": 4,
      "warmup-iterations": 1000,
      "iterations": 4500,
      "target-throughput": 100
    },
    {
      "operation": {
        "name": "past-sixtymins-query",
        "operation-type": "search",
        "body": {
          "query": {
            "bool": {
              "filter": {
                "range": {
                  "@timestamp": {
                    "gte": "now-90d",
                    "lte": "now"
                  }
                }
              }
            }
          }
        }
      },
      "clients": 4,
      "warmup-iterations": 1000,
      "iterations": 4500,
      "target-throughput": 100
    },
    {
      "operation": {
        "name": "must-query-with-time-filter",
        "operation-type": "search",
        "body": {
          "query": {
            "bool": {
              "must": [
                {
                  "match": {
                    "description.keyword": "desccrption 1034"
                  }
                }
              ],
              "filter": [
                {
                  "range": {
                    "@timestamp": {
                      "gte": "now-90d",
                      "lte": "now"
                    }
                  }
                }
              ]
            }
          }
        }
      },
      "clients": 4,
      "warmup-iterations": 1000,
      "iterations": 4500,
      "target-throughput": 100
    },
    {
      "operation": {
        "name": "String-query",
        "operation-type": "search",
        "body": {
          "query": {
            "query_string": {
              "default_field": "key1",
              "query": "sNYhzYdjkwjeVVunliSVMwxpaJAoDbpf",
              "default_operator": "AND"
            }
          }
        }
      },
      "clients": 4,
      "warmup-iterations": 1000,
      "iterations": 4500,
      "target-throughput": 100
    }
  ]
}

Queries run in sequential mode

If ran without issues , in results both queries should be displayed.

Test result